In October 2024, we performed an in depth survey to know runners’ preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction with numerous operating shoe manufacturers. The survey gathered responses from 794 runners, offering priceless insights into operating shoe preferences and the way totally different manufacturers are perceived by their customers.
With this pattern measurement, at a 95% confidence degree, our survey findings have a margin of error of roughly ±3.5%. Whereas this means robust statistical significance, it’s essential to notice that these findings symbolize the views and behaviors of our survey respondents and is probably not absolutely consultant of the general operating shoe market.
You’re free to make use of this knowledge on your personal articles, so long as you credit score us by linking again to our web site. If you would like entry to the uncooked knowledge file, please e mail guru(at)runningshoesguru.com
Introduction
This evaluation explores six key elements of runners’ relationships with operating shoe manufacturers:
- Model Consideration: Which manufacturers runners take into account when searching for footwear
- Buy Conduct: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for choices
- Favourite Manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners favor and why
- Essential Elements: What drives model choice amongst runners
- Satisfaction Ranges: How glad runners are with their chosen manufacturers
- Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
Model Consideration: Which model have you ever thought-about shopping for up to now 12 months?
The operating shoe market exhibits clear stratification when it comes to model consideration amongst runners.
Conventional running-focused manufacturers dominate the highest tier, with Asics (467) and Saucony (444) being thought-about by considerably extra runners than different manufacturers.
These specialist operating manufacturers are adopted by a powerful center tier consisting of New Stability (360), Hoka (359), and Brooks (341), every being thought-about by roughly comparable numbers of runners.
Apparently, world athletic put on giants Nike (292) and Adidas (285) sit in a lower-middle tier, suggesting that regardless of their huge presence typically sportswear, they aren’t the go-to decisions for devoted runners.
The consideration set is rounded out by Puma (176), Mizuno (125), and On (119), although it’s value noting that Puma’s comparatively stronger place may mirror their latest push into the efficiency operating market.
The outcomes recommend that runners are likely to favor manufacturers with deep operating heritage and specialised operating experience over normal athletic manufacturers, with conventional running-focused manufacturers commanding the vast majority of runner consideration.
Buy Behaviour: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for choices
Taking a look at precise purchases up to now 12 months, Saucony (300) and Asics (292) preserve their management place from the consideration part, creating a transparent high tier considerably forward of their rivals.
A stable center tier emerges with Nike, New Stability, Hoka, and Brooks all clustered very carefully collectively (181-183 purchases), adopted by Adidas (171).
The underside tier includes Puma (92), whereas Mizuno (54) and On (45) lag considerably behind – although this may occasionally mirror their smaller market presence or extra specialised positioning within the operating shoe market.
The conversion fee signifies what proportion of runners who thought-about a model went on to make a purchase order from that model up to now 12 months. That is calculated by dividing the variety of purchases by the variety of issues for every model, giving us perception into how successfully manufacturers convert curiosity into gross sales.
Saucony emerges because the clear chief, changing 67.6% of issues into purchases, adopted carefully by Nike (62.7%) and Asics (62.5%) – an attention-grabbing mixture of specialist operating and normal athletic manufacturers.
A definite center tier in conversion effectiveness consists of Adidas (60%), Brooks (53.1%), and Puma (52.3%), whereas New Stability and Hoka hover across the 50% mark regardless of their robust consideration numbers.
Most notably, this knowledge challenges the narrative from the consideration numbers – whereas conventional operating manufacturers dominated consideration, the conversion charges present world athletic manufacturers Nike and Adidas performing remarkably nicely at changing curiosity into gross sales.
On the decrease finish, Mizuno (43.2%) and notably On (37.8%) present considerably decrease conversion charges, suggesting potential boundaries between curiosity and buy for these manufacturers – probably associated to components corresponding to pricing, availability, or the necessity to strive these manufacturers in individual earlier than buy.
This conversion evaluation paints a unique image from the pure consideration knowledge, suggesting that whereas specialised operating manufacturers may seize preliminary curiosity extra successfully, each specialist and main athletic manufacturers could be equally efficient at changing that curiosity into gross sales.
This might point out that components past pure operating heritage – corresponding to pricing technique, distribution networks, or advertising effectiveness – play essential roles within the closing buy resolution.
Favourite manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners favor and why
When runners have been requested to pick out their single favourite model, Saucony (192) emerges because the clear chief, considerably forward of second-place Asics (142). A definite center tier kinds with Brooks (97), Nike (95), and Hoka (91) clustered carefully collectively, adopted by New Stability (66) and Adidas (60). The underside tier consists of Puma (26), Mizuno (18), and On (7), exhibiting a major drop-off from the upper tiers.
Trying on the development from consideration to favourite model offers fascinating insights into model loyalty and choice power. Saucony exhibits outstanding effectiveness in changing each consideration (43.2% of those that thought-about Saucony named it their favourite) and purchases (64.0% of purchasers take into account it their favourite) into model choice. Equally, Nike and Brooks present robust potential to transform purchasers into loyal followers, with 51.9% and 53.6% of their purchasers respectively naming them as favourite manufacturers. In distinction, manufacturers like On (15.6% of purchasers title it favourite) and Puma (28.3%) wrestle to transform even their clients into model advocates.
This development evaluation reveals that whereas some manufacturers could also be broadly thought-about or bought, their potential to change into a runner’s favourite varies dramatically. The info means that sure manufacturers, notably Saucony, have discovered a candy spot in not simply attracting consideration however in delivering an expertise that converts runners into model advocates. In the meantime, the comparatively low conversion charges for some manufacturers may point out both a job as a complementary slightly than major operating shoe, or potential gaps between expectations and expertise.
Essential Elements: What drives model choice amongst runners
When inspecting the components that drive model choice amongst runners, two components clearly dominate: Consolation (346) and Efficiency (333), collectively accounting for about 85% of all responses. There’s then a major drop to a second tier consisting of Sturdiness (48) and Worth (28), adopted by a 3rd tier of Type/Design (17), Model Fame (12), and Availability (10).
Taking a look at how these components fluctuate by model reveals attention-grabbing patterns. Brooks (56.7%), Hoka (67.0%), and New Stability (59.1%) are predominantly chosen for Consolation, whereas Saucony (52.6%), Puma (61.5%), and Adidas (48.3%) are primarily chosen for Efficiency. Asics exhibits a extra balanced profile between Efficiency (43.0%) and Consolation (41.5%). Apparently, Nike stands out with a good portion of runners (9.5%) citing Type/Design as their major cause for choice – the best amongst all manufacturers for this issue.
These findings recommend that whereas runners primarily make their model decisions based mostly on useful elements (Consolation and Efficiency), totally different manufacturers have efficiently positioned themselves alongside these axes in distinct methods. The info additionally reveals that components typically emphasised in advertising, corresponding to type and model repute, play a surprisingly minor function in runners’ model preferences, with sensible issues clearly dominating the decision-making course of.
Satisfaction Ranges: How glad runners are with their chosen manufacturers
The satisfaction survey reveals overwhelmingly optimistic suggestions throughout all manufacturers, with a formidable total satisfaction rating of 4.45 out of 5. The distribution is closely skewed towards excessive satisfaction, with 93.8% of respondents ranking their footwear both 4 or 5 stars. Extra particularly, 51.5% gave a 5-star ranking and 42.3% gave a 4-star ranking, whereas solely 6.2% rated their footwear 3 stars or beneath.
Taking a look at particular person manufacturers, satisfaction scores vary from 4.17 to 4.57, exhibiting persistently excessive satisfaction throughout the board. Whereas On leads with a 4.57 common, its small pattern measurement (n=7) makes this discovering much less dependable. Amongst manufacturers with substantial pattern sizes, Hoka and Brooks share the highest place (each 4.53), adopted carefully by Puma (4.50), Asics and Saucony (each 4.49). Notably, even the lowest-rated manufacturers – Nike (4.31) and Adidas (4.17) – preserve very optimistic scores above 4 stars, although they do present a barely larger proportion of 3-star rankings in comparison with different manufacturers.
These remarkably excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers recommend that operating shoe producers are usually assembly or exceeding runner expectations. The minimal variation between manufacturers (a spread of simply 0.4 between the best and lowest scores amongst main manufacturers) signifies that whereas runners might have robust model preferences, the precise expertise with their chosen model tends to be persistently optimistic.
Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
The chart compares the variety of runners who at present favor a model with those that plan to purchase it subsequent, proven as a proportion change. As an illustration, a +47% for New Stability signifies that 47% extra runners plan to purchase New Stability subsequent in comparison with those that at present take into account it their favourite model (from 66 present followers to 97 future consumers).
Taking a look at future buy intentions reveals some vital shifts within the operating shoe market. Two distinct teams emerge: manufacturers gaining momentum and types experiencing decline. On exhibits probably the most dramatic improve, with practically 4 instances as many runners planning to purchase it in comparison with present favorites (+285.7%, from 7 to 27 runners). New Stability additionally exhibits robust momentum with 47% extra future consumers than present favorites (+31 runners), adopted by Puma with a 61.5% improve (+16 runners). On the opposite finish, Saucony exhibits probably the most vital decline, with 33.9% fewer future buy intentions than present favorites (-65 runners), whereas Nike additionally sees a notable 25.3% lower (-24 runners).
The center of the market exhibits attention-grabbing stability, with Brooks, Hoka, and Asics sustaining practically equal numbers between present favorites and future purchases (variations underneath 10%). This implies these manufacturers have discovered a secure market place, neither gaining vital new converts nor dropping present supporters in giant numbers.
These patterns might point out a market in transition, with runners exhibiting elevated curiosity in manufacturers that is perhaps seen as challengers to conventional market leaders. The robust exhibiting from On, New Stability, and Puma, mixed with the decline in Saucony and Nike buy intentions, may mirror altering preferences within the operating group or profitable innovation and advertising from the ascending manufacturers.
Some closing observations
Trying throughout all elements of this operating shoe market evaluation, a number of key patterns emerge that paint an image of a dynamic and evolving market. The evaluation reveals each the power of conventional manufacturers and the emergence of thrilling challengers, suggesting an business in transition.
Market Dynamics
- Conventional operating manufacturers (Asics, Saucony) dominate preliminary model consideration
- Nevertheless, excessive consideration doesn’t routinely translate to purchases or loyalty
- Excessive total satisfaction (4.45/5.0 common) throughout all manufacturers
- Market exhibits vital fluidity in future buy intentions
The info reveals an attention-grabbing pressure between specialist operating manufacturers and normal athletic manufacturers. Whereas operating specialists excel at coming into the consideration set, world athletic giants like Nike and Adidas present outstanding effectivity in changing consideration to buy. This challenges the notion that severe runners routinely favor specialist manufacturers.
Rising Challengers & Future Implications
- On and Puma present outstanding momentum in future buy intentions
- On demonstrates probably the most dramatic development from present favorites to future intentions
- New Stability gaining vital floor in future buy plans
- Excessive satisfaction throughout manufacturers allows simpler model switching
- Extra various and aggressive market prone to emerge
- Established leaders might want to work more durable to keep up their positions
These patterns level to an business the place established leaders can’t relaxation on their laurels.
Whereas conventional operating manufacturers preserve robust positions, the excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers mixed with vital variation in future buy intentions point out that runners are more and more prepared to experiment. The operating shoe market of tomorrow might look fairly totally different from at the moment’s.
Wish to use this knowledge on your personal analysis? Ship us an e mail at guru(at)runningshoesguru.com!