The way to Cease RFID (digital monitoring of ALL livestock)

Desk of Contents[Hide][Show]
rogue food come and tag it

After a decade of relative quiet, the federal authorities has ramped again up its efforts to regulate the US meals provide, and eradicate any gamers and choices that received’t totally embrace the company authorities collusion that has outlined the US meals and farming sector for six a long time.

Shopping for golf equipment are having product siezed and destroyed. Farmers markets are seeing an enormous improve in inspections and harassment of artisans and native producers.

Farmers in every single place face a number of latest laws, guidelines, and applications meant to additional enrich the meat packers and different middlemen whereas taking more cash out of their pockets.

And lest you suppose householders with egg-laying chickens received’t be focused, suppose once more.

The federal government is already demanding registration of even one yard rooster within the UK, and the unique Nationwide Animal Identification System (NAIS) in america required the identical of city homesteaders. (1, 2)

This time…again for what could also be its fifth try…the USDA is as soon as once more making an attempt to roll out radio digital radio frequency ID tags for livestock with the sneaky rebranding from NAIS (a decade in the past) to RFID.

Why RFID?

Business entrance teams say we’d like RFID for higher transparency (these from of us who use processing amenities with no home windows and meat produced from 500 cows!) and to have the ability to reply rapidly to illness outbreaks throughout the nation.

In actuality, the explanation they need RFID is that it’ll give them larger management over the farmers who’ve little selection however to promote into the economic meat commodity system.

At the moment, 4 to 5 corporations management 80% or extra of beef, pork, and rooster in america.

They would favor that quantity to be a minimum of 100%, and RFID is one other strategy to drive farmers to play their recreation by their guidelines and push out smaller operations.

First they observe the animals… then they observe the folks

RFID is an element of a bigger, long-term objective for governments and well-connected companies to trace all human conduct, to allow them to revenue from it.

Just like the push for a single digital forex, the push for RFID would then permit:

  1. The power to impose limits and quotas on animal raisings and compelled cullings like we’re seeing in
    Europe and different international locations below the justification of local weather change (you’ve gotten too many cows,
    sheep, and goats producing too many emissions, so you could elevate much less animals!)
  2. Extra stringent enforcement of vaccines and the power to drive the adoption of mRNA and related
    vaccines by farmers so as to have the ability to put their animals into the processing chain.
  3. Skill to simply cull animals in areas and areas below the pretense of illness outbreaks like fowl
    flu utilizing phony PCR testing outcomes.
  4. Full and complete surveillance of the complete US meat provide.

As Catherine Austin Fitts, former Underneath Secretary of the US Division of Commerce has acknowledged, animal ID and digital forex ID are a precursor to the most important objective of all – common human RFID and monitoring.

Whereas this sounds outlandish, one of many earlier variations of the RFID program – NAIS (the nationwide animal ID system) – included a 1-800 quantity that farmers have been required to name inside 24 hours of any animal motion outdoors the designated property boundaries.

A real “why did the rooster cross the street” query, besides the USDA didn’t care why… simply when and the place, and in the event you did not comply, a whole lot to hundreds of {dollars} of fines have been to observe.

With the expansion of web and different applied sciences, the telephone quantity is not wanted, as the federal government (and companies who get entry to the information…) would know 24/7 the place all of the animals have been and what farmers and homesteaders have been as much as.

A lot of that is additionally tied to the push to get folks to undertake meatless meats, which to date have been, regardless of billions of {dollars} of investmenet, advertising, and authorities manipulation, an enormous flop.

As we’re seeing in Europe and components of the US, there’s a actual push…with huge cash behind it…to create a wholly meatless, even animal-free, meals system.

By means of bugs, by way of “plant primarily based meats,” no matter it takes, something however letting folks eat nutrient dense animal merchandise raised naturally on pasture!

What We Can Do to Cease RFID

If you’re a farmer or homesteader, be part of the tens of hundreds of us who’ve pledged to it doesn’t matter what, not comply, like Congressman Thomas Massie of KY, who raises grass-fed beef.

Second, take a second to contact your senators and consultant and ask them to cosponsor and help Rep. Harriet Hageman’s invoice, Modification 10, to cease EID/RFID. (3)

https://hageman.home.gov/media/press-releases/hageman-introduces-bill-block-mandatory-eid-ear-tags

Additionally, ask your consultant to help Rep. Hageman’s H.J.Res.167 decision which disapproves the rule submitted by the Division of Agriculture referring to “Use of Digital Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison”. (4)

Third, contemplate becoming a member of Congresswoman Hageman, Joel Salatin, John Moody, and others at Rogue Meals TX in November 2024 or Florida in March 2025, the place we may have a particular deal with stopping RFID, the fowl flu nonsense getting used to harass uncooked milk farmers, and extra, and assist us ship a message to the USDA that we’re able to battle to guard our farmers and meals provide.

***Use code HHE10 to get $10 off anyone or two-day ticket to the occasion!

References

(1) Defra broadcasts GB poultry register modifications following NFU ask

(2) NAIS They’re at it once more

(3) Hageman Introduces Invoice to Block Obligatory EID Ear Tags

(4) Disapproving the rule submitted by the Division of Agriculture referring to “Use of Digital Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison”