USC and USJ-R gamers battle for ball possession in one in all their Cesafi Season 22 matches. | Photograph from Sugbuanong Kodaker
CEBU CITY, Philippines — 4 matches will spotlight the beginning of the Cebu Faculties Athletic Basis, Inc. (Cesafi) Season 24 soccer event on Sunday, October 6, on the Cebu Metropolis Sports activities Middle (CCSC).
The six-time males’s soccer event champions, the College of San Carlos (USC) Warriors, and the three-peat highschool champions, the Don Bosco Technical Faculty (DBTC) Greywolves, will plunge into motion in tomorrow’s opening salvo.
The Warriors can be taking part in within the final scheduled match at 3 p.m. in opposition to the College of the Philippines (UP) Cebu Combating Maroons.
ALSO READ:
USC routs UC in finals, turns into winningest soccer workforce in Cesafi
DBTC Greywolves are Cesafi HS soccer three-peat champions
USPF routs UP Cebu in Cesafi school soccer
However, the Greywolves will tackle the USC-Fundamental Schooling at 10 a.m. in one of many two highschool matches.
Additionally, the College of Southern Philippines Basis (USPF) Panthers and the College of San Jose-Recoletos (USJ-R) Jaguars will conflict within the different males’s division match at 1 p.m.
Lastly, final yr’s runners-up, the Sacred Coronary heart Faculty-Ateneo de Cebu (SHS-AdC) Magis Eagles will face USJ-R within the opening match at 8 a.m.
To recall, USC turned Cesafi’s winningest workforce within the males’s soccer event after defeating the College of Cebu (UC) Site owners, 3-0, of their finals match, to surpass the College of San Jose-Recoletos (USJ-R) Jaguars for successful probably the most Cesafi males’s soccer titles final season.
In the meantime, the Greywolves achieved a three-peat championship run after beating the Magis Eagles in a lopsided, 5-0, win in the highschool finals.
Learn Subsequent
Disclaimer: The feedback uploaded on this website don’t essentially symbolize or replicate the views of administration and proprietor of Cebudailynews. We reserve the best to exclude feedback that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial requirements.