One of many largest tales in ladies’s basketball this previous 12 months was Caitlin Clark’s omission from the U.S. Olympic basketball crew. Clark — amid an up-and-down starting to her rookie season on the Indiana Fever — was left off the 12-woman roster, a call that immediately grew to become a nationwide controversy.
Critics railed USA Basketball for maintaining her off the crew, citing her rising reputation as motive why she ought to have been on the Paris Olympics roster.
Somewhat than Clark, the roster included guards with extra veteran guards like Jewell Loyd, Kelsey Plum, Jackie Younger, Chelsea Grey, Diana Taurasi, Sabrina Ionescu, and Kahleah Copper. Every of these guys had been multiple-time All-Stars — some even multiple-time Olympians. At 26 years outdated, Ionescu marked the youngest participant on the roster.
In a Time interview with Sean Gregory, Clark admitted her preliminary disappointment from being left off the USA basketball roster — however made clear she rejected the notion she ought to have been named to the crew as a result of her reputation.
When the rosters had been finalized, the Fever boasted a 3-9 report, and Clark was within the midst of an inconsistent begin to the season, a stretch that was marred by a number of high-turnover video games and spotty taking pictures performances.
“I gave them a whole lot of causes to maintain me off the crew with my play,” she mentioned.
She additionally acknowledged the depth of expertise on the USA Basketball roster.
“A degree all people was making was like, ‘Who’re you taking off the crew?’” Clark mentioned. “And that was an amazing level.”
Many media personalities insisted that leaving Clark off the roster was a mistake as a result of advertising and marketing motive — pointing to the visibility and a focus she would inveitably convey along with her to Paris.
ESPN’s Stephen A Smith and USA At present’s Christine Brennan had been two of the loudest voices that admonished USA Basketball for not placing Clark on the roster from a visibility standpoint — not as a result of the crew was lacking her skillset.
Why leaving Caitlin Clark off the 2024 US Olympic ladies’s basketball crew issues, quite a bit. I’ve reported on the crew at each Olympics since 1984. I’ve watched the gorgeous lack of protection & lack of curiosity each time. Listed below are 4 sections of my Feb column on this precise subject: pic.twitter.com/MjwqeVQdR8
— Christine Brennan (@cbrennansports) June 8, 2024
“Now, you got here house with the gold. You dealt with your corporation,” mentioned Stephen A Smith of the USA Basketball ladies’s crew. “However while you speak about advertising and marketing the game, I believe Staff USA missed a possibility to raise the profile of ladies’s excellence within the sport of basketball.”
Clark rejected the notion that she ought to have been on the roster as a result of her particular person reputation.
“I don’t need to be there as a result of I’m any individual that may convey consideration,” Clark mentioned. “I really like that for the sport of ladies’s basketball. However on the similar time, I need to be there as a result of they suppose I’m adequate. I don’t need to be some little individual that’s sort of dragged round for individuals to cheer about and solely watch as a result of I’m sitting on the bench.”
In actuality, Clark’s play in her rookie season finally demonstrated that she ought to have been on the crew as a result of her basketball prowess. After the Olympic break, she tremendously improved her play, finally establishing herself as the most effective guards within the league, if not the finest — and finally being named to the All-WNBA First Staff.
Clark averaged 23.4 factors and eight.9 assists after the break, and the Fever punched their ticket to the WNBA playoffs for the primary time since 2017. She recorded extra assists in a single WNBA season than any participant in WNBA historical past.
Jen Rizzotti, USA Basketball’s choice committee chair, vehemently disagreed that gamers’ reputation ought to have been a consideration.
”It might be irresponsible for us to speak about her in a manner aside from how she would affect the play of the crew,” Rizzotti mentioned. “As a result of it wasn’t the purview of our committee to determine how many individuals would watch or how many individuals would root for the U.S. It was our purview to create the perfect crew we may for Cheryl.”
Clark’s improved post-Olympic play demonstrated she nearly actually would have been match on the roster, particularly contemplating the struggles of among the USA crew’s older gamers all through the match.
Clark famous that being left off the roster “will certainly encourage me my whole profession.”
Barring an harm, the WNBA sensation is practicaly a shoe-in for the 2028 roster, one thing she instructed Gregory was a “an enormous, big purpose.”
However, the discourse round her exclusion by no means ought to have been centered round her reputation — or the potential viewership enhance that will have come along with her inclusion.
“That complete narrative sort of upset me,” Clark mentioned. “As a result of that isn’t honest. It’s disrespectful to the those who had been on the crew, that had earned it and had been actually good. And it’s additionally disrespectful to myself.”