Dr. Day is skeptical: “I have never seen nice printed knowledge on [the benefits of PRF for skin,],” she says. “I don’t [offer PRF] for the pores and skin, as a result of I have been following [its use] in Europe for many years and I have never seen a lot profit. I’ve seen folks sad with the outcomes, and even individuals who have scarring from it. I actually speak folks out of it.”
And also you may not need PRF for plumping up your nasal labial folds: “PRF is being bought as filler, however I do not suppose it really works like filler,” says Dr. Day.
So why are extra folks inquisitive about PRF? There’s a newness issue, for certain. There’s a consolation issue (whether or not or not it’s warranted), in one thing that’s derived from your personal physique. After which there’s this: Extra “sufferers are on the lookout for options to filler,” says Ava Shamban, MD, a board-certified dermatologist in Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, who provides PRF therapies in her personal apply. We’re dwelling in a time of “filler fatigue”—fueled by sufferers who “expertise sagging, heaviness, or stretched-out tissues from overfilling and improper strategies [like poor] product placement,” says Dr. Shamban. However regardless of all of the speak of filler fatigue, we’re additionally getting extra injectables—fillers had been up 4 % in 2023, as in comparison with 2022, based on the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’ survey and pattern report. We need to look younger. However we don’t need to look crammed. That makes “a extra ‘pure’ product for pores and skin revitalization and rejuvenation” a tempting proposition, says Dr. Shamban. She is extra optimistic about PRF’s potential, however agrees with Dr. Day that it’s not an alternative to hyaluronic acid filler, as a result of it doesn’t have the identical power or volumizing skills, and it breaks down quicker. Nonetheless, she sees a world wherein it’s potential PRF might be mixed with filler. It might be a useful device for particular sufferers—“as suppliers, we have now an enormous array of merchandise, however it’s about 25% the merchandise chosen and 75% strategies and injection fashion that make a distinction,” says Dr. Shamban.
What does the FDA must say about utilizing a affected person’s blood to doubtlessly regenerate their pores and skin? In accordance with Dr. Shamban, the FDA views PRP and PRF equally to a tissue switch. “They’re nervous about contamination, like if [the blood] is wrongly processed,” she explains, including that the recognition of PRF and PRP therapies at medspas versus board-certified dermatologists means there might doubtlessly be a mix-up of affected person samples. For reference, a New Mexico spa got here underneath fireplace after three folks had been contaminated with HIV after receiving PRP facials. The FDA has issued a warning letter towards regenerative drugs merchandise that embody stem cells. Within the letter, the FDA cautions, “There’s plenty of deceptive data on the web about these merchandise, together with statements in regards to the situations they can be utilized to deal with. FDA is anxious that many sufferers searching for cures and cures could also be misled by details about merchandise which can be illegally marketed, haven’t been proven to be protected or efficient, and, in some instances, might have important questions of safety that put sufferers in danger.” We reached out to the FDA to ask if PRF injections could be included on this warning, and at press time, had not acquired affirmation.
To learn extra injectable information: