That is Atlantic Intelligence, a e-newsletter during which our writers show you how to wrap your thoughts round synthetic intelligence and a brand new machine age. Enroll right here.
For a second, the AI doomers had the world’s consideration. ChatGPT’s launch in 2022 felt like a shock wave: That laptop packages might all of the sudden evince one thing like human intelligence advised that different leaps could also be simply across the nook. Specialists who had frightened for years that AI may very well be used to develop bioweapons, or that additional improvement of the expertise would possibly result in the emergence of a hostile superintelligence, lastly had an viewers.
And it’s not clear that their pronouncements made a distinction. Though politicians held loads of hearings and made quite a few proposals associated to AI over the previous couple years, improvement of the expertise has largely continued with out significant roadblocks. To these involved concerning the harmful potential of AI, the danger stays; it’s simply not the case that everyone’s listening. Did they miss their huge second?
In a latest article for The Atlantic, my colleague Ross Andersen spoke with two notable consultants on this group: Helen Toner, who sat on OpenAI’s board when the corporate’s CEO, Sam Altman, was fired all of the sudden final 12 months, and who resigned after his reinstatement, plus Eliezer Yudkowsky, the co-founder of the Machine Intelligence Analysis Institute, which is concentrated on the existential dangers represented by AI. Ross wished to know what they realized from their time within the highlight.
“I’ve been following this group of people who find themselves involved about AI and existential danger for greater than 10 years, and through the ChatGPT second, it was surreal to see what had till then been a comparatively small subculture all of the sudden rise to prominence,” Ross instructed me. “With that second now over, I wished to test in on them, and see what they’d realized.”
/media/img/posts/2024/09/AI_9_20/original.gif)
AI Doomers Had Their Huge Second
By Ross Andersen
Helen Toner remembers when each one who labored in AI security might match onto a college bus. The 12 months was 2016. Toner hadn’t but joined OpenAI’s board and hadn’t but performed a vital function within the (short-lived) firing of its CEO, Sam Altman. She was working at Open Philanthropy, a nonprofit related to the effective-altruism motion, when she first related with the small group of intellectuals who care about AI danger. “It was, like, 50 folks,” she instructed me not too long ago by cellphone. They had been extra of a sci-fi-adjacent subculture than a correct self-discipline.
However issues had been altering. The deep-learning revolution was drawing new converts to the trigger.
What to Learn Subsequent
P.S.
This 12 months’s Atlantic Pageant is wrapping up right this moment, and you may watch periods through our YouTube channel. A fast suggestion from me: Atlantic CEO Nick Thompson speaks a few new research exhibiting a shocking relationship between generative AI and conspiracy theories.
— Damon